| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Election | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| China | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Save Act / Save America Act | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Event does not qualify | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Biden | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Democrat | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Taiwan | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Trump | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hottest | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Transgender | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Mog / Mogged / Mogging | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Manufacturing | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Obliterate / Obliterated / Obliteration | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nuclear | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Shutdown / Shut Down | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Crypto / Bitcoin | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Toyota | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tariff | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| AI / Artificial Intelligence | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| NATO | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Shinzo / Abe | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Gas / Gasoline | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Iran | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hormuz | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Oil | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Invested / Investment | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Trillion | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Affordable / Affordability | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which of a set list of topics or phrases former President Trump will utter during his bilateral meeting with Japan; the outcome matters because specific language can signal policy priorities and affect diplomatic, economic, and media reactions.
U.S.–Japan bilateral meetings commonly cover security cooperation, trade, technology, North Korea, and supply-chain resilience; outcomes depend on the formal agenda, pre-meeting coordination, and any emerging regional events. Trump’s conversational style and tendency to emphasize particular themes or grievances can make the set of likely mentions different from a typical administration’s meeting.
Market prices reflect traders’ collective expectations about which items on the outcome list will be said during the meeting and update as new information (agendas, leaks, travel schedules, or press access) becomes available; they are not transcripts and do not guarantee exact phrasing will be used.
A mention typically requires an on-the-record verbal statement during the bilateral meeting itself that is captured in an official transcript, video, or authoritative pool report; off-the-record comments or later paraphrases in secondary interviews generally do not count unless specified in the market’s resolution rules.
Resolution will rely on public, verifiable records such as the White House or Prime Minister’s Office readouts, video or audio of the bilateral session, pool reports from credentialed journalists, and other primary-source accounts identified by the market operator.
Treatment of paraphrases depends on the market’s resolution criteria: some outcomes require substantially similar content or intent to be considered a match, while others require the specific wording; participants should consult the event’s outcome definitions and the operator’s adjudication policy for how equivalence is judged.
Format changes affect which records are available; if the meeting becomes private with no on-the-record statements, fewer mentions will be verifiable and the market will resolve based on the available official records and the operator’s predefined rules about what constitutes the bilateral meeting record.
Resolution generally occurs once an authoritative public record covering the bilateral portion is published and the market operator declares the result; traders should monitor the market page for official timing, notices, and the specific adjudication announcement after the meeting.