📊
Mentions OPEN

What will Trump say during his Bilateral Meeting with Germany?

📊 $980K traded 🏦 Source: Kalshi
Total Volume
$980K
Open Interest
729,699
Active Markets
30
Markets
30

Trade This Market

Yes Bid
Yes Ask
Last Price
Prev Close
Buy YES → Buy NO

Prices in cents (1¢ = 1%). Trade on Kalshi.

All Outcomes (30)
Outcome Probability Yes Bid Yes Ask 24h Change Volume
Terrorist / Terrorism 1%
$130K Trade →
Epic Fury 1%
$83K Trade →
Mog / Mogged / Mogging 1%
$69K Trade →
Obliterate / Obliterated / Obliteration 1%
$56K Trade →
Khamenei / Ayatollah 1%
$49K Trade →
Tariff 99%
99¢ 100¢ $42K Trade →
Nuclear 99%
99¢ 100¢ $40K Trade →
Israel 99%
99¢ 100¢ $40K Trade →
Bibi / Netanyahu 1%
$39K Trade →
Biden 99%
99¢ 100¢ $32K Trade →
Crypto / Bitcoin 1%
$31K Trade →
Peace in the Middle East 99%
99¢ 100¢ $30K Trade →
Hormuz 1%
$28K Trade →
Hottest 1%
$26K Trade →
Trillion 1%
$24K Trade →
Negotiate / Negotiated / Negotiation 99%
99¢ 100¢ $24K Trade →
Uranium 1%
$23K Trade →
Too Late 1%
$22K Trade →
Oil 99%
99¢ 100¢ $21K Trade →
Ukraine 99%
99¢ 100¢ $19K Trade →
NATO 99%
99¢ 100¢ $16K Trade →
Illegal Alien 1%
$16K Trade →
China 99%
99¢ 100¢ $16K Trade →
5% 99%
99¢ 100¢ $16K Trade →
Democrat 99%
99¢ 100¢ $16K Trade →
Greenland 1%
$16K Trade →
Iran 99%
99¢ 100¢ $15K Trade →
Midnight Hammer 99%
99¢ 100¢ $14K Trade →
Eight War 99%
99¢ 100¢ $13K Trade →
Windmill 99%
99¢ 100¢ $12K Trade →

About This Market

This market asks which topics, phrases, or named subjects President Trump will publicly mention during his bilateral meeting with Germany; it matters because those remarks signal diplomatic priorities and can influence diplomatic relations, markets, and public debate.

U.S.–Germany meetings historically cover defense and NATO burden‑sharing, trade and industrial policy, energy and sanctions, and security issues such as Russia and Ukraine. Bilateral exchanges between a U.S. president and German leadership can be shaped by recent tensions, campaign priorities, and short‑term crises, so the specific wording and emphasis often diverge from formal agendas.

Market prices reflect the crowd’s aggregated expectation about which mentions will occur and update as new information arrives (schedules, leaks, readouts, and live remarks). Use them as a real‑time signal of changing expectations rather than a definitive forecast of final wording.

Key Factors

Frequently Asked Questions

What sources will be used to verify what Trump 'said' for settlement of this market?

Settlement will rely on publicly verifiable sources such as official White House and German government readouts, live transcripts of the bilateral session or joint press conference, video/audio recordings, and confirmed social media posts attributable to the President within the market’s defined timeframe. Consult the market’s specific settlement rules for the authoritative list.

Which people on the German and U.S. sides matter most for shaping the content of Trump's remarks?

Key players include the German head of government (Chancellor), senior German ministers present (foreign, defense, economy), the U.S. President and senior U.S. officials accompanying him (Secretary of State, National Security Advisor, Secretary of Defense), and the joint press corps that may prompt questions.

Do informal hallway comments or private meeting asides count toward the listed outcomes?

Whether informal remarks count depends on the market’s settlement definitions: typically only statements in public, on‑the‑record settings (press conferences, official transcripts, or posts acknowledged by an official account) are used for verification. Check the event’s settlement criteria to see how off‑the‑record remarks are treated.

How will a change from a joint press conference to a private session affect the kinds of mentions likely to appear?

A private session generally reduces the chance of explicit or combative public mentions because fewer remarks are on the record; a joint press conference raises the likelihood of direct questions and soundbites that match explicit outcome categories, and therefore tends to broaden the range of verifiable mentions.

How should traders use historical U.S.–Germany meetings when evaluating possible mentions in this event?

Look at prior bilateral readouts and transcripts to identify recurring themes (defense spending, trade, sanctions, energy, NATO cooperation) and Trump’s past rhetorical patterns for cues on phrasing and emphasis. Treat history as informative but not determinative, since live context and recent developments often produce deviations.

Related Markets