| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Israel / Israeli | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Venezuela | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Guterres / Secretary General | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Trump | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Geneva | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| China | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| America First | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Budget | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Signal | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Fraud / Waste | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Event does not qualify | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ukraine | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Woke / DEI | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Terrorist / Terrorism | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Taxpayer | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| NATO | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Oil | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hormuz | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which specific topics, names, or phrases Representative Mike Waltz will utter during a UN Oversight Field Hearing. Those remarks matter because they can reveal congressional priorities, influence media narratives, and affect oversight outcomes.
Mike Waltz is a U.S. Representative known for focusing on national security and foreign policy; members like him often use hearings to press for accountability, funding changes, or policy shifts. A UN oversight field hearing typically centers on program performance, budgetary scrutiny, and international conduct, and remarks will be shaped by the hearing agenda, recent events, and the witnesses called.
Market prices on this event are collective signals about which mentions observers expect from Waltz and will update as new information (agenda releases, posted remarks, leaks, or live testimony) becomes available. Use price movements as indicators that participants have incorporated new evidence about likely remarks.
The market lists the hearing but the closing time is TBD; the timing matters because remarks frequently reference the most recent developments, so comments are more likely to reflect events that occur shortly before or during the hearing.
Each outcome corresponds to a specific topic, phrase, name, or line that Waltz might utter during the hearing; the market resolves based on whether those exact mentions appear in the official transcript or recording according to the event rules.
Members often post prepared statements on their official House webpages, committee sites, and social media; checking Waltz’s congressional office releases and the committee’s hearing materials is the fastest way to find any preposted text.
Based on his public record, he is more likely to address national security and oversight themes—such as accountability of international programs, defense and intelligence concerns, adversary behavior, and U.S. assistance—although the exact mix will follow the hearing agenda and witness testimony.
Unexpected witness disclosures, powerful new evidence, aggressive questioning from other members, time constraints, or breaking news can prompt unscripted follow‑ups, interruptions, or clarifications that lead to different mentions than those in prepared text.