| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event does not qualify | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Trump | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Bitcoin | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Blockchain | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Treasury | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| AI / Artificial Intelligence | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Smart Contract | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Transparency | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tokenized / Tokenization | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Currency | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Inflation | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Iran | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Oil / Gas / Gasoline | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market tracks the specific rhetoric and policy stance of Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr regarding the regulation of stablecoins. It serves as a sentiment barometer for how the U.S. central bank intends to integrate or restrict private digital assets within the broader financial system.
Stablecoins have become a focal point for the Federal Reserve due to their potential impact on monetary policy, payment system stability, and consumer protection. Governor Barr has consistently advocated for a robust federal framework, often emphasizing that stablecoins should not exist outside of traditional banking oversight. These discussions are critical for stakeholders, as they signal the Fed's regulatory appetite ahead of potential congressional legislation.
Market prices represent the collective expectation of participants regarding the specific wording or thematic focus Barr will emphasize in his upcoming public remarks.
A mention is confirmed if Barr explicitly uses the specific terminology or addresses the policy concept outlined in the contract outcome during his scheduled official discussion.
No, this market is scoped specifically to his designated discussion on stablecoins as defined by the market parameters.
As the primary architect of bank supervision, Barr’s commentary carries significant weight in determining which entities will be permitted to issue stablecoins and what reserve requirements they must meet.
If the speech occurs but Barr fails to address the specific terms outlined in the market outcomes, the 'None of the above' or 'No mention' outcome will be favored.
Yes, Barr has previously testified and spoken at length about the necessity of keeping stablecoins within the 'regulatory perimeter' of the banking system.