| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen F. Austin | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Kansas St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Oregon | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Duke | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Virginia Tech | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Holy Cross | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Oklahoma | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| SMU | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Vermont | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Murray St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Baylor | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| UC San Diego | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Green Bay | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Rice | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Oklahoma St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ West Virginia | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Alabama | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Texas Tech | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Virginia | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Georgia | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| James Madison | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| California | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| UCLA | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Iowa St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Notre Dame | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Louisville | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Tennessee | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Colorado St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Southern University | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ South Carolina | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Syracuse | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Navy | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Samford | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Utah | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Grand Canyon | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Ohio St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Howard | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Stanford | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Texas | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Ole Miss | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Western Illinois | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| South Dakota St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Charleston | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Idaho | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Jacksonville | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| High Point | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Clemson | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Rhode Island | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Michigan | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Missouri St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ North Carolina | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Colorado | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| UTSA | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ UConn | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Minnesota | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Richmond | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ USC | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ LSU | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Washington | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Princeton | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Vanderbilt | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Iowa | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Gonzaga | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Arizona St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Miami (OH) | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| FDU | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Kentucky | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Fairfield | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Villanova | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Michigan St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ North Carolina St. | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Maryland | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Nebraska | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ TCU | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| California Baptist | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| ✓ Illinois | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
This market aggregates trader views on which competitors will advance through the Women's Round of 32 Qualifiers, an early-stage set of matches that determines entry into the tournament’s round-of-32 field. It matters because qualifiers set the main-draw lineup and can shift expectations for the remainder of the event.
Qualifying rounds are typically held immediately before the main draw and involve lower-ranked or unseeded players/teams competing for fixed slots in the round of 32. Historically, qualifiers can produce both expected outcomes—higher seeds advancing—and occasional upsets that alter bracket dynamics and tournament narratives. The market remains open until the platform or tournament organizer confirms final qualifying results (market close is listed as TBD).
Market prices reflect the collective, continually updated judgment of traders about which entrants will qualify; treat them as a dynamic signal that incorporates new information like lineups, injuries, and match results. Use prices alongside independent facts (draw, official results) rather than as definitive predictions.
Resolution timing depends on when the tournament completes all qualifying matches and when the platform specifies the market close; because the event page lists the close as TBD, traders should monitor official match schedules and platform announcements for the final resolution timestamp.
The 49 listed outcomes represent distinct named options the platform is offering for this qualifiers event (for example, individual players/teams, specific qualifier slots, or match-by-match scenarios). Check the market’s outcome labels and any linked documentation on the event page to map each outcome to the corresponding entrant or slot.
Settlement is based on official, published results from the tournament organizer (match reports, official bracket updates) and follows the platform’s resolution rules; in case of discrepancies, the platform’s stated dispute-resolution or verification procedures determine final outcomes.
The platform will follow its predefined rules and the tournament’s replacement policy: outcomes may be adjusted to reflect official substitutions, a walkover may be recorded, or affected outcomes may be voided depending on the specific market terms—check the market rules for withdrawal and substitution policies.
Historical qualifying results and a player’s past performance provide useful context about experience and resilience in high-pressure qualifying matches, but they should be combined with current indicators—recent form, injuries, head-to-head matchups, and draw position—since those factors typically drive near-term qualification outcomes.