| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 145.5 points scored | 48% | 46¢ | 47¢ | — | $5K | Trade → |
| Over 142.5 points scored | 56% | 54¢ | 56¢ | — | $2K | Trade → |
| Over 148.5 points scored | 36% | 36¢ | 41¢ | — | $417 | Trade → |
| Over 130.5 points scored | 83% | 76¢ | 84¢ | — | $172 | Trade → |
| Over 139.5 points scored | 62% | 59¢ | 63¢ | — | $16 | Trade → |
| Over 160.5 points scored | 1% | 13¢ | 15¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| Over 151.5 points scored | 33% | 30¢ | 34¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| Over 133.5 points scored | 0% | 72¢ | 78¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 136.5 points scored | 0% | 66¢ | 71¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 154.5 points scored | 0% | 24¢ | 29¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 157.5 points scored | 0% | 19¢ | 23¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This prediction market asks which total combined points bracket the Weber State at Portland State game will fall into. Traders use it to express expectations about game tempo and scoring, and to hedge or speculate on offensive/defensive performance.
Weber State and Portland State are NCAA Division I programs that have met periodically in conference play; their matchup context (conference standing, recent form, and coaching styles) shapes scoring expectations. Seasonal trends such as average pace, three-point reliance, and roster continuity are key background elements that influence projected totals.
Market prices represent the aggregated views of participants about which total-points range is most likely and update as new information arrives. Read prices as relative market confidence across the available total-point ranges rather than fixed forecasts.
The event page currently lists the market close as TBD; platforms commonly close total-points markets at or shortly before tip-off, but check the market page for the official closing time and any updates.
The 11 outcomes partition the range of possible combined scores into discrete brackets from low to high; the market interface shows the exact numeric range for each outcome so you can see which bracket corresponds to a particular total.
Prioritize official injury reports and starting-lineup confirmations: loss of a primary scorer typically lowers expected total points, while loss of a defensive anchor can raise it. Markets tend to react quickly to verified lineup changes, so monitor updates close to tip-off.
Head-to-head history can be informative about matchup tendencies (e.g., frequent high-scoring affairs or defensive slugfests), but sample sizes are often small; combine historical matchups with current-season pace and efficiency metrics for a more robust view.
Reported volume gives a sense of liquidity—the listed $7,529 indicates moderate activity—while having 11 outcomes spreads expectations across many brackets; lower liquidity can mean larger price moves from individual trades, so consider order size and slippage when participating.