| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 points scored | 50% | 48¢ | 50¢ | — | $589 | Trade → |
| Over 143.5 points scored | 44% | 40¢ | 44¢ | — | $69 | Trade → |
| Over 152.5 points scored | 0% | 19¢ | 25¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 131.5 points scored | 0% | 69¢ | 73¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 126.5 points scored | 0% | 77¢ | 84¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 137.5 points scored | 0% | 56¢ | 57¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 158.5 points scored | 0% | 10¢ | 14¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 134.5 points scored | 0% | 63¢ | 67¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 149.5 points scored | 0% | 26¢ | 30¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 146.5 points scored | 0% | 33¢ | 37¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 155.5 points scored | 0% | 14¢ | 19¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 124.5 points scored | 0% | 80¢ | 86¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 128.5 points scored | 0% | 74¢ | 79¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how many combined points will be scored in the Wake Forest at Clemson game; it matters to traders who want to express a view on the matchup's scoring environment rather than on which team wins.
Wake Forest and Clemson are ACC opponents whose games can swing from low-scoring defensive battles to higher-scoring shootouts depending on personnel and coaching approach. Historical matchups and recent seasons show variability: Clemson has often featured physical play and clock management while Wake Forest has used tempo and passing concepts that can increase scoring if healthy. Pre-game injuries, coaching game plans, and home-field context at Clemson all shape expected point totals going into the event.
Market odds on total-points outcomes reflect how traders collectively price different scoring ranges; they are a real‑time signal of consensus sentiment rather than a guarantee. Use those prices alongside your own analysis of matchup factors, injuries, and conditions.
The event page lists the close time as TBD; markets of this type typically close before kickoff or when official lineups are posted, so check the KALSHI market page for the final announced close time.
They represent discrete total-points outcomes created by the market — each outcome corresponds to a different combined-points range or bucket for the game rather than a single winner.
Resolution rules vary by market; consult the market’s official rules or resolution notes on the KALSHI event page to see whether overtime is included for this specific total-points market.
A lost starting QB commonly reduces expected scoring, but impact depends on the backup’s experience, the offensive scheme, and the opponent’s defensive strengths — assess matchup-specific context rather than assuming a uniform drop in points.
Low or zero volume means the market is thinly traded or recently opened; prices can be more volatile and less representative of broad consensus, so factor liquidity into trade size and timing decisions.