| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 64.5 1H points scored | 43% | 43¢ | 52¢ | — | $10 | Trade → |
| Over 52.5 1H points scored | 0% | 47¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 76.5 1H points scored | 0% | 0¢ | 58¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 67.5 1H points scored | 0% | 22¢ | 46¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 58.5 1H points scored | 0% | 62¢ | 86¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 73.5 1H points scored | 0% | 5¢ | 26¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 70.5 1H points scored | 0% | 15¢ | 36¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 61.5 1H points scored | 0% | 49¢ | 73¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 55.5 1H points scored | 0% | 72¢ | 93¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how many points will be scored during the first half of the Villanova vs DePaul game, allowing traders to express expectations about early-game scoring. First-half totals matter because they isolate tempo, starting lineups, and early-game strategies that can differ from full-game patterns.
Villanova and DePaul meet as programs with different recent track records and styles; Villanova has a history of efficient offense and set-play execution, while DePaul has varied results and often depends on matchup-specific dynamics. Historical meetings provide context, but roster turnover, coaching changes, and season-to-season shifts mean past results are an imperfect guide for a single first-half total.
Market prices reflect the aggregated view of traders about the likely first-half scoring outcome and will move as new information arrives. Use prices as a snapshot of market expectations, and expect rapid updates around starter/injury news and tip-off.
Close timing is platform-determined (listed here as TBD); many first-half markets stop trading at or shortly before tip-off, so check the exchange for the official cutoff.
The nine outcomes correspond to different discrete first-half total ranges or thresholds offered by the market; each outcome is a separate way for traders to express which scoring band they expect for the first half.
Adjust expectations for first-half scoring: the absence of a primary scorer or playmaker typically reduces early offensive output, while a bench-heavy lineup can change pace and efficiency; markets often respond quickly to such news.
Historical head-to-head first-half scores are useful for context but should be weighted cautiously due to roster changes, differing season contexts, and small sample sizes; prioritize current-season first-half trends and roster availability.
No. First-half totals cover only points scored during the regulation first half, so any overtime scoring does not change the first-half result.