| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago wins by over 1.5 goals | 36% | 33¢ | 37¢ | — | $274 | Trade → |
| Chicago wins by over 2.5 goals | 0% | 21¢ | 26¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Vancouver wins by over 1.5 goals | 0% | 20¢ | 27¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Vancouver wins by over 2.5 goals | 0% | 11¢ | 18¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which spread outcome will occur in the Vancouver at Chicago game — i.e., by how many goals one team will outscore the other. It matters because spreads let traders express views about the expected margin, not just the winner.
This is a professional Vancouver-versus-Chicago matchup, typically settled on the final official score; factors like recent form, travel between cities, and lineup decisions commonly shape expectations. Historical matchups between these teams can offer context, but each game is also influenced by short-term factors such as injuries and goaltending.
Market odds reflect the collective view of traders about which margin range is most likely and will change as new information arrives; interpret them as market sentiment about the spread rather than a single ground-truth forecast.
Settlement follows the event organizer’s official final score as published by the league; the margin of victory derived from that official result determines which spread outcome resolves as winning.
The market close is listed on the contract page (here marked TBD); generally these markets close shortly before puck drop, but you should check the market page for the final confirmed close time.
The four outcomes partition the possible margins of victory into mutually exclusive ranges (for example, various ranges favoring either team); the exact labels and boundaries are shown on the market page and determine which outcome wins based on the final margin.
Watch starting goalie announcements, injury reports and any late scratches, top-line deployments and power-play unit confirmations for both Vancouver and Chicago, and timeline updates on travel or rest that could alter lineups.
Head-to-head history offers useful context about matchup tendencies, but its weight should be balanced with current-season form, roster changes, goaltending and situational factors like travel and rest; recent games typically carry more predictive value than older meetings.