| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Knies: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| John Tavares: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tage Thompson: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ryan McLeod: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Rasmus Dahlin: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jason Zucker: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Josh Norris: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Alex Tuch: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| William Nylander: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Josh Norris: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Rasmus Dahlin: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Alex Tuch: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| William Nylander: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Morgan Rielly: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Rasmus Dahlin: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matias Maccelli: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jason Zucker: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Josh Norris: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| John Tavares: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matthew Knies: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ryan McLeod: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tage Thompson: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Alex Tuch: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matias Maccelli: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| John Tavares: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matias Maccelli: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Easton Cowan: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jason Zucker: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ryan McLeod: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Morgan Rielly: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tage Thompson: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matthew Knies: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| William Nylander: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Easton Cowan: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Easton Cowan: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market lets traders bet on the points-related outcomes for the NHL game between the Toronto Maple Leafs and the Buffalo Sabres. It aggregates market views about scoring and player/team production for that specific matchup, which can help participants express and trade on expectations ahead of the game.
Toronto and Buffalo play in the same division and have contrasting roster profiles: Toronto often features established high-end scorers, while Buffalo has a younger core and different goaltending/staffing dynamics. Game-level scoring is driven by lineup choices, goaltender form, special teams, and game context (home/away, travel, back-to-backs). This market is hosted on Kalshi and will follow the platform’s event and settlement rules.
Market prices on Kalshi reflect the consensus view of traders about each listed outcome given available information and will change as new information arrives. Treat market odds as a live summary of expectations, not as fixed forecasts — they update with news such as lineup releases, injuries, and in-game developments.
The market close time is listed as TBD for this event; Kalshi typically posts a specific cutoff on the market page and markets usually close before puck drop. Monitor the market page for the official close time and any updates.
Definitions vary by outcome: some outcomes may track team goals, combined game goals, or individual player points (goals+assists). The market’s outcome descriptions define the exact unit being traded — read those descriptions carefully to know what counts.
Whether overtime goals or shootout stats count depends on the market rules for this event; many markets specify 'regulation only' or 'regulation plus overtime' and typically exclude shootout goals from player statistics. Check the market’s settlement rules on Kalshi for the definitive answer.
Lineup and injury news often moves the market quickly because they change expected scoring. Traders often wait for official lineup releases before making final decisions; if you rely on news, account for the possibility of late changes and increased volatility as teams announce rosters.
Yes — recent head-to-head trends, venue effects (home vs. away), and past scoring patterns provide useful context, but they should be combined with current-season form, roster availability, and goalie matchups since past results don’t guarantee future scoring.