| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricked | 0% | 33¢ | 45¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| 9INE | 0% | 54¢ | 67¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market is a wager on which team wins Map 1 of the Stake Ranked Episode 1 closed qualifier match between Tricked and 9INE in 2026. Map-level markets matter because the first map sets momentum for the series and can affect qualification paths in a closed qualifier.
Stake Ranked Episode 1 is a 2026 closed qualifier event featuring regional and invited teams vying for spots in the main event; closed qualifiers typically have high stakes for tournament progression. Tricked and 9INE are established esports organizations with different regional backgrounds and playstyles, and map-level performance can reflect recent practice form, roster stability, and map-pool specialties.
Market prices reflect the collective expectations of traders and update as new information arrives (lineup news, map vetoes, server assignments). Use the market as a real-time signal of perceived chances, but combine it with your own assessment of the factors below.
The market settles on which team wins the first officially played map in the match between Tricked and 9INE. The declared winner of Map 1, including results decided in overtime, determines settlement.
The market will close before Map 1 begins; the platform will display the official closing timestamp on the event page. Traders should check the event page for the exact close time, as it may update if the match schedule changes.
Last-minute roster changes can materially affect the Map 1 outlook. Confirm official lineup announcements from tournament organizers or team accounts, note the lineup lock deadline if provided, and factor in how a substitute's map experience compares to the regular player.
No — overtime outcomes are included. The market settles on the team that wins Map 1 after all regulation and overtime periods as recorded by the match officials.
Head-to-head history can provide context, but map-specific and recent results are more informative. Consider sample size, whether matches used the same map, roster continuity, and shifts in meta or tactics since prior meetings.