| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sinners | 0% | 53¢ | 63¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Team Nemesis | 0% | 37¢ | 47¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market covers which team wins Map 1 between Sinners and Team Nemesis in the Stake Ranked Episode 1 closed qualifier; Map 1 can set momentum for the match and affect bracket outcomes. It matters to traders because single-map markets capture immediate match dynamics separate from full-match bets.
Closed qualifiers determine which teams advance to the main Stake Ranked event and typically feature regional contenders and up-and-coming squads. Sinners and Team Nemesis meet in a high-stakes, early-stage match where format, map veto, and on-day form matter more than long-term rankings. Because qualifiers often use BO1s or quick formats, each map carries outsized importance for progression.
Market odds are a real-time reflection of trader expectations about who will win Map 1 and update as new information arrives. Treat them as a snapshot of the market consensus rather than a definitive prediction; check the market feed for live updates and the platform for resolution rules.
The platform lists the official close time; it is currently shown as TBD. In practice, map markets commonly close at or just before the map’s official start time or when match officials lock betting — check the event page and market feed for the exact timestamp.
The two outcomes correspond to which team wins Map 1: one outcome for Sinners winning the map and the other for Team Nemesis winning the map. The market resolves to the map winner as recorded by the tournament organizer.
The winner is determined according to the tournament’s match rules (for example, first to the required number of rounds in regulation and any overtime rules). Official results, score sheets, or organizer rulings are used to resolve the market.
Watch for confirmed lineups and substitutions, warmup or showmatch results, announced map picks/bans, coach or player interviews that indicate strategy, and any technical or travel issues reported by teams or admins.
Historical head-to-head and map-specific records provide context and can inform expectations, but their relevance declines if there have been recent roster changes, meta shifts, or long gaps since the last meetings. Use recent, map-specific data as the strongest indicator.