| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merrimack wins the 1H by over 2.5 points | 49% | 43¢ | 49¢ | — | $6 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins the 1H by over 11.5 points | 0% | 0¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins the 1H by over 10.5 points | 0% | 0¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins the 1H by over 14.5 points | 0% | 0¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins the 1H by over 17.5 points | 0% | 0¢ | 53¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins the 1H by over 5.5 points | 0% | 20¢ | 43¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins the 1H by over 4.5 points | 0% | 12¢ | 31¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins the 1H by over 7.5 points | 0% | 0¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins the 1H by over 13.5 points | 0% | 0¢ | 53¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins the 1H by over 8.5 points | 0% | 10¢ | 29¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins the 1H by over 1.5 points | 0% | 23¢ | 43¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which first-half point-spread outcome will occur in the Siena vs Merrimack game; it matters because first-half markets let traders express views specifically on early-game performance and halftime position. First-half outcomes can move differently than full-game lines due to coaching strategies and starting lineup matchups.
Siena and Merrimack are collegiate programs with different roster compositions, coaching styles, and typical game tempos; those differences shape how the first half of a matchup unfolds. Historical meetings, venue (home/away), and any recent lineup or injury news provide context, but the immediate pregame information often has the largest impact on a first-half spread market. Because this is a discrete-market setup (11 outcomes), traders are selecting among a set of fixed first-half margin ranges rather than a continuous spread.
Market prices reflect how traders collectively value each discrete first-half spread outcome and change as new information arrives (starting lineups, injuries, and betting flow). Movement in prices before the game starts signals changing expectations but does not represent an immutable forecast.
The closing time for this specific market is listed on the trading platform and may be tied to the official game start; because the event page shows 'Closes: TBD', check the platform or market page shortly before tipoff for the confirmed close time.
Each outcome corresponds to a particular first-half margin or spread interval (for example, ranges in which Siena leads by X points or Merrimack leads by Y points at halftime); the platform’s outcome labels explain the exact point ranges.
Late news about starters, injuries, or a key player's availability can materially shift expectations for the first half, so traders often wait for official starting lineup confirmations and immediate pregame injury reports before placing or adjusting positions.
Head-to-head history can offer useful context—such as stylistic mismatches or recurring halftime patterns—but current-season form, roster changes, and situational factors (home court, travel, injuries) typically have greater influence on a single first-half outcome.
Low volume indicates limited liquidity: prices may be more volatile and individual trades can move outcomes substantially, and it may be harder to enter or exit large positions without impacting the market.