| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merrimack wins by over 2.5 Points | 47% | 47¢ | 50¢ | — | $18K | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 4.5 Points | 39% | 39¢ | 42¢ | — | $5K | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 5.5 Points | 35% | 35¢ | 38¢ | — | $2K | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 7.5 Points | 32% | 28¢ | 32¢ | — | $349 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 1.5 Points | 49% | 49¢ | 53¢ | — | $214 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 14.5 Points | 7% | 5¢ | 9¢ | — | $192 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 1.5 Points | 39% | 39¢ | 43¢ | — | $151 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 2.5 Points | 35% | 36¢ | 39¢ | — | $84 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 4.5 Points | 30% | 29¢ | 32¢ | — | $47 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 5.5 Points | 27% | 26¢ | 29¢ | — | $6 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 19¢ | 23¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 16.5 Points | 0% | 7¢ | 12¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 17¢ | 21¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 14.5 Points | 0% | 10¢ | 15¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 12¢ | 17¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 19.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 9¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 13.5 Points | 0% | 12¢ | 17¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 16¢ | 21¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 10¢ | 14¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 25¢ | 29¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 13.5 Points | 0% | 7¢ | 12¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Siena wins by over 7.5 Points | 0% | 20¢ | 22¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Merrimack wins by over 17.5 Points | 0% | 6¢ | 10¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market lets traders take positions on the point-spread outcome for the college basketball game Siena at Merrimack. It matters because spread markets aggregate public information about matchup expectations and can be used to express or hedge views on the game margin.
Siena (MAAC) and Merrimack (NEC) are Division I programs with differing styles and rosters; conference affiliation, travel and recent scheduling can all affect how this particular matchup plays out. The market lists 23 discrete outcomes (spread brackets) and has seen $960 in trading volume to date. The market close is listed as TBD, so traders should monitor the event page for the final cutoff and any rule updates.
Market prices represent the consensus about which spread bracket is most likely to occur and move as new information (injuries, lineups, betting flow) enters the market. Use the prices as a real-time signal combined with your own matchup analysis rather than a definitive forecast.
The market close is listed as TBD on the event page; resolution will follow the platform’s published event rules and is typically based on the official final score as recorded in the game box score—consult the market page for whether overtime is included and for the final cutoff time.
The 23 outcomes correspond to specific spread brackets or margin ranges (for example, discrete bands indicating a Siena win by X–Y points or a Merrimack win by Z–W points); check each outcome label on the market page to see the exact margin ranges covered.
Home-court can affect pace, shooting percentage and foul calls; compare both teams’ recent home/away splits, travel distance, and crowd impact to gauge how much the location should move your expected margin.
The most influential players are typically each team’s leading scorers, primary ball-handlers (who control pace and turnover rates), and key interior defenders or rebounders; monitor recent box scores, minutes trends, and injury reports to see who is available and playing at full strength.
Late news often produces rapid price movement and increased volatility; markets typically adjust quickly, so confirm reports from official team sources and the market page before trading, and expect spreads to shift as bettors and traders react.