| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darius Garland: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Bennedict Mathurin: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Darius Garland: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Darius Garland: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Darius Garland: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Bennedict Mathurin: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Darius Garland: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Bennedict Mathurin: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Bennedict Mathurin: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Bennedict Mathurin: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which specific three-pointer outcome will occur in the San Antonio at Los Angeles C (Clippers) game. It matters because three-point volume and accuracy heavily influence game pace, scoring runs, and market movement for game-level props.
San Antonio and Los Angeles C bring different offensive identities and rotation depths that influence three-point attempts—one team may rely more on perimeter shooting while the other may use more post actions or midrange shots. Venue, recent form, roster changes, and coaching strategy also shape expected three-point volume; historical matchups can show trends but nightly lineups and injuries often have bigger effects.
Market odds reflect how traders collectively price the likely three-pointer outcome based on available information and update as new data arrives (lineups, injuries, rest). Treat the odds as a snapshot of market sentiment, not a guarantee; they move as in-game and pregame information changes.
They are the discrete resolution options defined by the market creator—typically exact counts or count ranges for three-pointers in this specific game. Each outcome will be settled against the official final total as defined in the market's rules.
Settlement depends on the market's official rules and the data source used for resolution. Many sports markets explicitly state whether overtime is included; if the event description does not specify, consult the market's settlement rules or the platform's FAQ for that policy.
The title suggests a game-level three-pointers market, but the precise scope (combined total vs. team-specific) is determined by the outcome definitions. Verify each outcome label to see whether it refers to the combined game total or a single team.
Resolution follows the platform's contingency and settlement policies—markets may be voided, postponed, or resolved using whatever official box score or league declaration the platform designates. Check the event's settlement terms for the platform's specific procedures.
Monitor announced starting lineups, injury reports and late scratches, rest decisions for star perimeter shooters, coaching comments about game plan, and travel/fatigue indicators—changes affecting who shoots from deep or who defends the perimeter will have the biggest impact.