| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIP | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Alliance | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which team will win Map 1 between Alliance and NIP in the Roman Imperium Cup 2026. Map 1 is important because it sets momentum for the match and can influence subsequent map choices and strategy.
The Roman Imperium Cup 2026 is a competitive tournament featuring established professional teams; Alliance and NIP (Ninjas in Pyjamas) are organizations with long histories in the scene, each with map-specific strengths. Relevant context includes the tournament format (best-of series and veto rules), recent roster stability, and any game-patch or meta shifts that affect map playstyles.
Market odds reflect aggregated expectations from traders and update as new information arrives; they are a real-time indicator rather than a guarantee. For official settlement, rely on the Roman Imperium Cup match report and the market operator's published rules.
The market close time is listed as TBD; typically markets close at or just before the official map start time or when the market operator (Kalshi) sets a closure. Check the market page and the tournament schedule for the final posted close time.
This market settles on the official winner of Map 1 as recorded by the Roman Imperium Cup organizers. If the match goes to overtime, settlement follows the tournament’s official match report and the market operator’s published settlement rules.
Officially announced roster changes, stand‑ins, or role swaps can materially affect map performance; traders typically adjust expectations based on the experience and recent results of the substitute. Verify any lineup announcements against the tournament’s official roster release before trading.
Whether Map 1 was chosen by one of the teams or resulted from a ban/pick sequence matters because a team selecting the map will usually choose one that favors its playstyle. Consult the tournament’s veto format to know who had pick priority and how that shapes Map 1 dynamics.
Past head‑to‑head results on the same map offer useful context but should be weighed alongside recency, roster changes, meta/patch differences, and sample size. Use historical data as one input among current form, scrim reports, and map-specific statistics.