| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephon Castle: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Devin Booker: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Devin Booker: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Devin Booker: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Stephon Castle: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Devin Booker: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Victor Wembanyama: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Devin Booker: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| De'Aaron Fox: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which three-point outcome will occur in the NBA game between Phoenix (visiting) and San Antonio (home). It matters because three-point volume and accuracy strongly influence game flow, spread dynamics, and player usage outcomes.
Phoenix and San Antonio have contrasting offensive and defensive profiles that affect three-point production: one club typically leans on high-usage perimeter creators and catch-and-shoot spacing, while the other emphasizes transition, defensive schemes, and developing perimeter shooters. The market's 20 distinct outcomes provide a granular set of possible three-point results (for example ranges or player-specific thresholds), so historical team tendencies, recent form, and lineup availability are all relevant context.
Market prices reflect the crowd’s collective expectation about which three-point outcome will occur and will move as new information arrives (starting lineups, injuries, rest, coach announcements, in-game pace). Use prices to track shifting expectations rather than as fixed forecasts.
Close time is marked TBD on the market page; the official close and final resolution will follow the platform’s published schedule and use the league’s official box score and scorekeeping to determine the three-point counts. Check the market page for the confirmed close time and any tie-break rules prior to the scheduled game.
The 20 outcomes break the possible three-point results into distinct, labeled buckets (for example: ranges of total team threes, combined threes, or player-specific thresholds). Each outcome label on the market page describes the exact condition that will win; review those labels carefully before trading.
Look for confirmed starters and rotation minutes for the primary perimeter scorers, any late injury or rest reports, play-calling tendencies in recent games (more pick-and-roll or kick-outs vs. isolation), and hustle metrics like offensive rebounding that can create extra shooting chances.
San Antonio’s approach to perimeter defense — whether they are switching, sending strong closeouts, or funneling to help defenders — will alter opponent three-point attempts and accuracy. Home-court factors like travel fatigue for Phoenix and local game tempo tendencies can also influence possession counts and shot selection.
Resolution in the event of postponement or suspension depends on the platform’s contingency and settlement rules for incomplete games. Common approaches include voiding the market or resolving based on official league determinations; consult the market page and platform rulebook for the definitive policy for this event.