| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMass wins by over 2.5 Points | 48% | 47¢ | 48¢ | — | $3K | Trade → |
| Ohio wins by over 10.5 Points | 16% | 10¢ | 17¢ | — | $29 | Trade → |
| UMass wins by over 5.5 Points | 41% | 36¢ | 41¢ | — | $11 | Trade → |
| Ohio wins by over 4.5 Points | 0% | 27¢ | 34¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UMass wins by over 17.5 Points | 0% | 5¢ | 12¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ohio wins by over 7.5 Points | 0% | 17¢ | 25¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ohio wins by over 1.5 Points | 0% | 41¢ | 43¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ohio wins by over 13.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 11¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UMass wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 15¢ | 22¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UMass wins by over 14.5 Points | 0% | 10¢ | 15¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UMass wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 24¢ | 29¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which side of the point spread will occur in the Ohio at UMass college football game; spread markets are useful because they focus on margin of victory rather than just the winner and aggregate information from many participants.
Ohio and UMass are FBS programs with distinct strengths and schedules; the matchup outcome depends on current-season form, roster availability, and where the game is played. Because the market closes TBD, traders will incorporate late-breaking news such as injuries, weather, and coaching decisions into prices before settlement.
Each spread outcome corresponds to a specific point-margin scenario (e.g., Ohio wins by X or more, UMass covers, or various margin ranges); market prices reflect collective expectations and will move as new information becomes available.
The market consists of 11 distinct spread outcomes, each representing a different point-margin scenario; consult the market interface for the precise point ranges and payout rules tied to each listed outcome.
The market's close is listed as TBD; settlement generally occurs after the official final score is confirmed by the game authority or scoreboard, with a short delay to allow for official reviews and scoring corrections.
Late injuries materially change expected margins; traders typically reprice outcomes rapidly after credible injury reports, so verify official team reports and consider waiting for market adjustments or trading incrementally as new information arrives.
Direct head-to-head history can be informative but is often limited; prioritize recent season performance, opponent-adjusted metrics, and personnel changes over distant prior meetings when assessing likely margins.
Home-field tends to provide some advantage—travel, crowd support, and venue familiarity—that markets typically price in; the extent of that advantage depends on travel distance for Ohio, local conditions at kickoff, and each team’s track record in away or home games.