| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven Stamkos: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Teuvo Teravainen: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matthew Wood: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matthew Wood: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Frank Nazar: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Steven Stamkos: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tyler Bertuzzi: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Steven Stamkos: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jonathan Marchessault: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ryan O'Reilly: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Roman Josi: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Frank Nazar: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Filip Forsberg: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Luke Evangelista: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Matthew Wood: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Roman Josi: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ryan O'Reilly: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Frank Nazar: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Teuvo Teravainen: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Connor Bedard: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tyler Bertuzzi: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Luke Evangelista: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Roman Josi: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jonathan Marchessault: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ryan O'Reilly: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Luke Evangelista: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Teuvo Teravainen: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Filip Forsberg: 3+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Connor Bedard: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tyler Bertuzzi: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Connor Bedard: 2+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Filip Forsberg: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jonathan Marchessault: 1+ | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market focuses on the scoring outcome (points/goals) in the NHL game between the Nashville Predators and the Chicago Blackhawks. It matters because scoring projections drive lineup decisions, prop strategies, and how traders position around game-time news.
Nashville and Chicago have distinct styles—Nashville often emphasizes defensive structure and goaltending while Chicago has historically fluctuated between rebuilding phases and higher-scoring outings. Matchups, recent form, and roster availability create the baseline context traders use when evaluating likely scoring ranges for this specific game.
Market prices aggregate participant expectations about how many goals will be scored in this matchup; sharp movements usually reflect new, material information such as lineup announcements, goalie changes, or travel/rest updates. Treat prices as a continuously updating consensus rather than fixed predictions.
Each outcome corresponds to a specific total-goals bucket or exact total as defined on the market page; consult the event’s outcome list to see whether outcomes are single totals (e.g., 0,1,2...) or ranges (e.g., 0–1, 2–3).
The event page shows the official close time; if listed as TBD currently, wait for the market to publish a precise close—trades must be placed before that posted close time.
Settlement rules (including whether overtime or shootout goals are counted) are specified in the market’s rulebook on the event page; check the posted settlement terms for this game to confirm which scoring periods are included.
A starter change or key scratch materially shifts scoring expectations and typically moves market prices; traders should monitor official lineup and goalie confirmations because those announcements are high-impact inputs for this event.
Resolution procedures depend on the market’s rules: the event page will state whether markets roll to the rescheduled game, void, or are otherwise settled in the event of postponement or cancellation—consult those specified settlement policies for this event.