| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 85.5 1H points scored | 27% | 8¢ | 27¢ | — | $2 | Trade → |
| Over 82.5 1H points scored | 0% | 16¢ | 35¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 76.5 1H points scored | 0% | 42¢ | 53¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 73.5 1H points scored | 0% | 51¢ | 68¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 79.5 1H points scored | 0% | 24¢ | 44¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 70.5 1H points scored | 0% | 58¢ | 80¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 67.5 1H points scored | 0% | 69¢ | 88¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 88.5 1H points scored | 0% | 0¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 64.5 1H points scored | 0% | 47¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how many combined points Northern Kentucky and Wright St. will score in the first half, letting traders express views on early-game scoring. First-half totals matter because they isolate starting-lineup matchups, pace and pregame news that can move expectations before halftime.
Northern Kentucky and Wright State are mid-major college programs whose game-level tempo, three-point reliance, and defensive matchups drive scoring swings. Rosters and coaching approaches change season to season, so recent team form, current-season metrics and the specific starting lineups are more informative than long-ago meetings. The market lists nine outcomes and will resolve to the official first-half combined point total per the game's box score; the listed close time is currently TBD.
Market prices express the collective expectation for which first-half total bucket is most likely; higher prices indicate stronger market support for a given outcome. Use those prices alongside your own projection and real-time news to decide whether the market offers value for your view.
The winning outcome is determined by the combined points scored by both teams in the official first half as recorded in the game’s official box score; consult the platform’s settlement rules for edge cases like game suspension or incomplete halves.
The market close time is listed as TBD on the event page; check the market interface for updates—many first-half total markets close at or shortly before tipoff, but confirm the exact timestamp provided by the platform.
Late changes can materially shift expectations: loss of a primary scorer or ball-handler usually lowers first-half scoring expectations, while a surprise starter who increases pace or shooting volume can push totals higher—monitor official injury reports and lineups and watch how market prices move in response.
Head-to-head can reveal matchup tendencies, but roster turnover and seasonal context matter more; prioritize recent games, current-season offensive/defensive metrics and starting-lineup matchups over older meetings.
Each outcome label on the market page specifies the exact point range or total it represents; open the market details to read those labels and review the platform’s settlement rules to understand how ties or boundary totals are handled.