| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Golden | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Mark Byington | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| TJ Otzelberger | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nate Oats | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dusty May | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Billy Donovan | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Sean May | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Kenny Smith | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Wes Miller | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jerry Stackhouse | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| King Rice | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jeff Lebo | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Brad Frederick | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Marcus Paige | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dan Hurley | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Scott Drew | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Tommy Lloyd | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Mark Few | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Brad Underwood | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Eric Musselman | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Grant McCasland | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Brad Stevens | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Rick Pitino | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Josh Schertz | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| John Groce | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Luke Murray | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Sean Miller | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jay Wright | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Will Wade | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Ben McCollum | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Michael Malone | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This prediction market asks who will become the next head coach of the University of North Carolina men's basketball program; it matters because the hire shapes on-court performance, recruiting, donor support, and program direction. Markets aggregate public information and sentiment about likely hires.
North Carolina is a high-profile college basketball program with a long history of national success, strong recruiting expectations, and intense public scrutiny. Coaching searches at programs of this stature involve interviews, negotiations over staff and contract terms, and rapid responses to media reporting, all of which influence the timeline and candidate pool.
Market prices on this page reflect collective expectations about which named candidate will be announced as head coach and will update as new information appears; prices are not guarantees but indicators that change with credible news and official announcements.
It means the market does not yet have a scheduled closing time; trading can continue until the market operator sets a close or the market is resolved following an official coaching announcement.
The market will settle to the outcome that exactly matches the official announcement from UNC or other designated authority; if the announced name is not listed, settlement will follow the market’s rules for 'other' or closest-match outcomes—check the market rules for details.
A large number of named outcomes reflects a broad candidate list and allows traders to express views on specific individuals; however, liquidity is split across many options, so prices for any single outcome may be more sensitive to news.
Official UNC communications, confirmations that a candidate has accepted or declined interviews, leaked negotiation details, and reports from highly credible insiders or beat writers are the most market-moving items.
An interim or internal candidate who stabilizes recruiting and retains staff can gain market support quickly because they reduce transition risk, while high-profile external candidates can shift expectations if they enter negotiations or are publicly linked to the job.