| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 5.5 Points | 50% | 50¢ | 51¢ | — | $10K | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 7.5 Points | 42% | 42¢ | 45¢ | — | $5K | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 4.5 Points | 56% | 53¢ | 56¢ | — | $968 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 7.5 Points | 13% | 10¢ | 16¢ | — | $389 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 8.5 Points | 41% | 38¢ | 41¢ | — | $302 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 17.5 Points | 11% | 11¢ | 14¢ | — | $286 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 23.5 Points | 1% | 1¢ | 2¢ | — | $260 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 23.5 Points | 6% | 3¢ | 5¢ | — | $67 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 17.5 Points | 3% | 1¢ | 2¢ | — | $60 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 20.5 Points | 3% | 1¢ | 2¢ | — | $50 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 2.5 Points | 65% | 60¢ | 65¢ | — | $44 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 10.5 Points | 34% | 28¢ | 34¢ | — | $16 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 14.5 Points | 25% | 17¢ | 23¢ | — | $13 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 20.5 Points | 21% | 3¢ | 9¢ | — | $4 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 1.5 Points | 68% | 64¢ | 69¢ | — | $3 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 11.5 Points | 38% | 26¢ | 30¢ | — | $2 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 16.5 Points | 0% | 11¢ | 17¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 8¢ | 11¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 4.5 Points | 0% | 16¢ | 22¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 11¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 13.5 Points | 0% | 18¢ | 26¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UT Rio Grande Valley wins by over 19.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 11¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 5.5 Points | 0% | 13¢ | 19¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 6¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 2.5 Points | 0% | 22¢ | 25¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 1.5 Points | 0% | 25¢ | 28¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nicholls St. wins by over 14.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 8¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how the point spread will resolve for the college matchup between Nicholls State and UT Rio Grande Valley. It matters because the spread encodes the market’s collective view of the expected margin and is used by traders to express and hedge views on the game outcome.
This is a collegiate athletics spread market featuring two NCAA programs: Nicholls State and UT Rio Grande Valley. Both programs play in different conferences and bring different styles, roster makeups, and travel patterns that commonly influence point spreads in college matchups.
Market prices for a spread reflect the consensus view of traders about likely margin outcomes and will move as new information arrives; they are best read as the exchange’s real‑time aggregation of participant expectations rather than a fixed prediction.
Settlement will occur after the official game result is available; the market settles to the single outcome corresponding to the official final margin as defined by the exchange’s settlement rules. Check the event page or exchange rules for precise settlement timing.
It means the market uses a ladder of discrete spread outcomes (multiple point-differential buckets) covering possible final margins. Only the one outcome whose range contains the official final margin will pay out.
TBD indicates the exchange has not yet posted a firm market close time; trading can remain open until the exchange sets the close (often before kickoff or at a scheduled cutoff). Monitor the event page for updates and be prepared for last-minute changes.
Late information can move the market quickly, especially in lower-liquidity markets. Confirm reports from official team sources, evaluate how the change affects minutes and matchup dynamics, and size positions to account for potential volatility.
Total volume is an indicator of liquidity and trader participation: higher volume generally implies tighter, more information-rich pricing; lower volume means prices can be more easily moved by single large trades, so manage order size and execution risk accordingly.