| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikal Bridges: 15+ | 52% | 49¢ | 51¢ | — | $2K | Trade → |
| Jakob Poeltl: 10+ | 52% | 52¢ | 55¢ | — | $1K | Trade → |
| Jalen Brunson: 20+ | 74% | 73¢ | 74¢ | — | $1K | Trade → |
| Karl-Anthony Towns: 20+ | 42% | 39¢ | 42¢ | — | $795 | Trade → |
| Karl-Anthony Towns: 25+ | 22% | 16¢ | 18¢ | — | $641 | Trade → |
| Jalen Brunson: 35+ | 15% | 9¢ | 14¢ | — | $490 | Trade → |
| Scottie Barnes: 15+ | 61% | 57¢ | 61¢ | — | $408 | Trade → |
| OG Anunoby: 15+ | 56% | 52¢ | 56¢ | — | $347 | Trade → |
| Jalen Brunson: 25+ | 55% | 51¢ | 53¢ | — | $328 | Trade → |
| Jakob Poeltl: 20+ | 9% | 3¢ | 7¢ | — | $201 | Trade → |
| Josh Hart: 20+ | 10% | 8¢ | 10¢ | — | $174 | Trade → |
| Josh Hart: 10+ | 65% | 62¢ | 65¢ | — | $121 | Trade → |
| Mikal Bridges: 10+ | 81% | 75¢ | 77¢ | — | $114 | Trade → |
| OG Anunoby: 20+ | 30% | 24¢ | 27¢ | — | $100 | Trade → |
| Jakob Poeltl: 15+ | 21% | 20¢ | 21¢ | — | $88 | Trade → |
| Jalen Brunson: 30+ | 31% | 26¢ | 31¢ | — | $70 | Trade → |
| Immanuel Quickley: 15+ | 65% | 58¢ | 65¢ | — | $70 | Trade → |
| Mikal Bridges: 25+ | 7% | 5¢ | 7¢ | — | $67 | Trade → |
| Karl-Anthony Towns: 15+ | 70% | 65¢ | 70¢ | — | $64 | Trade → |
| Josh Hart: 15+ | 30% | 29¢ | 30¢ | — | $27 | Trade → |
| RJ Barrett: 15+ | 65% | 64¢ | 66¢ | — | $25 | Trade → |
| Mitchell Robinson: 10+ | 20% | 0¢ | 15¢ | — | $15 | Trade → |
| Scottie Barnes: 10+ | 87% | 81¢ | 86¢ | — | $12 | Trade → |
| Mikal Bridges: 20+ | 23% | 21¢ | 25¢ | — | $8 | Trade → |
| OG Anunoby: 10+ | 82% | 78¢ | 82¢ | — | $7 | Trade → |
| RJ Barrett: 30+ | 2% | 2¢ | 5¢ | — | $4 | Trade → |
| Scottie Barnes: 25+ | 89% | 8¢ | 13¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| RJ Barrett: 20+ | 34% | 38¢ | 40¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| Immanuel Quickley: 20+ | 39% | 0¢ | 39¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| RJ Barrett: 25+ | 0% | 15¢ | 16¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jakob Poeltl: 25+ | 0% | 0¢ | 5¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Karl-Anthony Towns: 30+ | 0% | 3¢ | 6¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Mitchell Robinson: 25+ | 0% | 0¢ | 7¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Mitchell Robinson: 20+ | 0% | 0¢ | 7¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Immanuel Quickley: 25+ | 0% | 0¢ | 17¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| OG Anunoby: 25+ | 0% | 7¢ | 11¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Mitchell Robinson: 15+ | 0% | 0¢ | 4¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Scottie Barnes: 20+ | 0% | 29¢ | 32¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Immanuel Quickley: 30+ | 0% | 0¢ | 7¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market lets traders take positions on the total points scored in the New York at Toronto game; totals markets matter because they concentrate attention on pace, matchup dynamics, and roster availability rather than which team wins.
New York and Toronto matchups often reflect contrasting styles (tempo, defensive schemes and scoring balance) that drive game totals. Seasonal context — recent form, travel schedules and any roster changes — can shift typical scoring patterns from one meeting to the next.
Market prices are a live aggregation of traders' views about the most likely total points outcome; use price movements and traded volume as signals that new information (injuries, rotations, lineup announcements) has been incorporated.
The listing shows 'Closes: TBD'; on many platforms points markets close at or just before scheduled tip-off or when lineups lock, so verify the exact close time on the market page and monitor for any updates as game time approaches.
The 39 outcomes indicate a granular set of possible total-point results (either exact totals or tightly spaced ranges); inspect the market's outcome labels to see whether outcomes are exact point totals, ranges, or buckets and trade accordingly.
A confirmed absence typically lowers the expected total because of lost scoring and potential pace changes; the market usually reacts quickly after official injury reports, so watch price moves and related news to assess impact.
Whether overtime is included depends on this specific market's rules — some totals markets include overtime while others do not — so check the market's rule section on the platform before trading.
Head-to-head history provides context on stylistic matchups, but it should be weighted with caution: prioritize recent meetings, current-season statistics, roster continuity and venue, since long-term history can be skewed by outdated lineups or coaching changes.