| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming wins by over 1.5 Points | 47% | 46¢ | 47¢ | — | $762 | Trade → |
| Nevada wins by over 2.5 Points | 42% | 42¢ | 44¢ | — | $85 | Trade → |
| Wyoming wins by over 4.5 Points | 33% | 33¢ | 39¢ | — | $25 | Trade → |
| Nevada wins by over 8.5 Points | 26% | 21¢ | 26¢ | — | $5 | Trade → |
| Nevada wins by over 5.5 Points | 30% | 29¢ | 33¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| Wyoming wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 15¢ | 21¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Wyoming wins by over 16.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 11¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Wyoming wins by over 13.5 Points | 0% | 10¢ | 14¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nevada wins by over 14.5 Points | 0% | 5¢ | 12¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nevada wins by over 16.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 10¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nevada wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 12¢ | 18¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Wyoming wins by over 7.5 Points | 0% | 24¢ | 29¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how the point spread will resolve for the college football game Nevada at Wyoming; it matters because spread outcomes determine which spread-based positions win or lose.
The market covers Nevada visiting Wyoming, where game-day factors like altitude, travel, and team form typically shape expectations. Historical matchups, coaching styles, and recent offensive/defensive trends for both programs provide useful context when evaluating spread-related outcomes.
Market prices reflect traders’ aggregated expectations about which spread range will occur; they move as new information arrives (injuries, lineup changes, weather, etc.), and can be used to gauge prevailing sentiment about the likely margin.
The market close time is listed as TBD; the platform will publish the final close before the event and may lock trading shortly before kickoff.
They correspond to discrete spread ranges or margins (including potential push or exact-margin outcomes) that cover the different ways the final scoring margin can resolve; check the platform’s outcome labels for the exact mapping.
Head-to-head trends can indicate matchup tendencies (e.g., low-scoring affairs, one team’s consistent defensive advantage), but roster turnover and coaching changes mean recent seasons are more relevant than distant history.
Late injury reports, starting quarterback status, unexpected absences of primary skill-position players, or midweek suspension/news are the most market-moving roster developments.
Modest volume means liquidity is limited, so individual trades or new information can produce larger price swings; the more outcomes there are, the thinner liquidity is likely to be per outcome, increasing sensitivity to news.