| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ty Dillon | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| William Byron | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Ryan Preece | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Justin Allgaier | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Daniel Suárez | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Kyle Larson | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Chris Buescher | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Denny Hamlin | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Brad Keselowski | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Chase Briscoe | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Austin Cindric | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Ryan Blaney | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Zane Smith | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Noah Gragson | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Cole Custer | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Ross Chastain | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| AJ Allmendinger | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Josh Berry | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Carson Hocevar | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Tyler Reddick | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Erik Jones | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Joey Logano | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Kyle Busch | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| ✓ Ty Gibbs | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Riley Herbst | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Cody Ware | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Todd Gilliland | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Christopher Bell | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Austin Dillon | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Michael McDowell | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Bubba Wallace | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Chase Elliott | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Chad Finchum | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| John H. Nemechek | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Shane Van Gisbergen | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Connor Zilisch | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
| Ricky Stenhouse | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Resolved |
This market tracks which drivers will secure a podium finish (top 3) at the NASCAR Food City 500. It serves as a benchmark for gauging driver performance on one of the most iconic short tracks in the NASCAR Cup Series.
Held at Bristol Motor Speedway, the Food City 500 is known for its high-banked, half-mile concrete oval layout that forces constant side-by-side racing. Unlike larger tracks, Bristol rewards drivers with aggressive driving styles and short-track proficiency. Historically, success at this event is determined by a driver's ability to navigate heavy traffic and manage tire wear throughout the 500-lap distance.
The current market pricing reflects the collective sentiment on which drivers are most likely to manage the physical demands and unpredictable chaos of the Bristol surface.
Bristol is a high-banked, half-mile 'bullring' that forces constant traffic management and frequent contact, making a top 3 finish significantly more volatile than at larger intermediate tracks.
Yes, drivers with extensive experience at Bristol often better anticipate the 'rhythm' of the track, though current car equipment and team engineering play a massive role in modern performance.
The 500-lap duration is split into stages, which influences tire strategy and fuel conservation throughout the race, often shifting the field's hierarchy as the race nears its conclusion.
Because Bristol is so small, drivers must navigate 'lapping' slower cars constantly, requiring precise car control and the ability to find grip in multiple lanes.
A single incident at Bristol can end a driver's day instantly; the high probability of multi-car accidents late in the race is a primary factor in market volatility.