| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hofstra wins by over 4.5 Points | 47% | 48¢ | 53¢ | — | $1K | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 5.5 Points | 52% | 45¢ | 49¢ | — | $279 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 1.5 Points | 65% | 59¢ | 65¢ | — | $192 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 7.5 Points | 43% | 37¢ | 43¢ | — | $15 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 19.5 Points | 12% | 4¢ | 12¢ | — | $14 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 10.5 Points | 13% | 5¢ | 14¢ | — | $10 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 14.5 Points | 22% | 13¢ | 22¢ | — | $8 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 2.5 Points | 25% | 26¢ | 31¢ | — | $8 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 17.5 Points | 16% | 7¢ | 14¢ | — | $7 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 1.5 Points | 28% | 29¢ | 34¢ | — | $5 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 7.5 Points | 18% | 11¢ | 18¢ | — | $5 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 13.5 Points | 62% | 16¢ | 24¢ | — | $3 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 4.5 Points | 24% | 18¢ | 24¢ | — | $3 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 21¢ | 28¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 24¢ | 31¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 2.5 Points | 0% | 55¢ | 61¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 9¢ | 16¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 20.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 11¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 5.5 Points | 0% | 15¢ | 22¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 16.5 Points | 0% | 9¢ | 17¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Monmouth wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 12¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Hofstra wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 32¢ | 39¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This prediction market asks how the point spread will fall for the Monmouth at Hofstra game; it matters because the spread summarizes the expected margin and is what bettors and analysts use to compare expected performance between the two teams.
Monmouth and Hofstra are collegiate teams meeting in a single-game matchup played at Hofstra, so venue and travel matter. Historical head-to-head results, recent season form, roster availability, and coaching matchups all provide context that shapes market opinions leading up to the game.
Market prices on spread outcomes reflect how traders collectively view the likelihood of different margin ranges; as news arrives (injuries, starting lineups, rest) those prices can move to incorporate the new information.
The market close time is listed as TBD for this event; typically spread markets close shortly before game start per the platform’s rules. Settlement generally uses the official final score (including overtime) from the game’s record; confirm the platform’s market-specific rules for exact timing and settlement procedures.
The 11 outcomes correspond to discrete point-differential ranges (bins) that cover possible margins of victory for either team, plus any tie/bin labels the platform uses; consult the outcome labels on the market page to see the exact bracketed margins.
Settlement is based on the official final margin from the game’s authoritative source as defined by the market rules; that margin is compared to the outcome bins to determine which outcome resolves as the winner.
Late availability news is among the biggest drivers of price movement: loss or return of a starter can shift expected margin quickly, and low-liquidity markets can react sharply to such updates. Traders typically reweight outcomes based on the updated on-court personnel.
Resolution in the event of postponement or cancellation depends on the platform’s contingency rules—common approaches include voiding the market if the game is not completed within a specified window or resolving based on an official result if played later. Check the market’s terms for the platform’s exact policy.