| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence wins by over 5.5 Points | 48% | 45¢ | 48¢ | — | $1K | Trade → |
| Providence wins by over 2.5 Points | 61% | 58¢ | 60¢ | — | $1K | Trade → |
| Providence wins by over 20.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 9¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Marquette wins by over 7.5 Points | 0% | 11¢ | 17¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Marquette wins by over 4.5 Points | 0% | 19¢ | 23¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Providence wins by over 17.5 Points | 0% | 7¢ | 14¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Providence wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 21¢ | 27¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Providence wins by over 14.5 Points | 0% | 13¢ | 21¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Marquette wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 6¢ | 12¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Marquette wins by over 1.5 Points | 0% | 30¢ | 36¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Providence wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 31¢ | 37¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This prediction market asks which point‑spread outcome will occur in the Marquette at Providence college basketball game; it matters because spread markets capture how traders expect the final margin to fall and provide a real‑time consensus on game competitiveness.
Marquette and Providence are Big East conference opponents; Providence is the home team for this matchup, which can influence game dynamics. Historical matchups, season form, travel schedules, and coaching matchups help set expectations for the spread going into the game.
Market prices in a spread market represent the collective assessment of where the final margin will lie across the listed outcomes and move as new information arrives. Changes in price typically reflect new injury news, lineup changes, or shifts in trader sentiment and liquidity.
The market currently shows a close time of TBD; typically spread markets lock shortly before the scheduled tipoff or when the exchange publishes a final lock time, so monitor the event page for the official closing time.
The 11 outcomes correspond to discrete point‑margin bands covering possible final margins (for example, various ranges where either Marquette or Providence covers); each outcome captures a different margin bracket rather than a simple win/loss.
Head‑to‑head trends are one input: look for consistent advantages in style matchups, whether one team routinely defends or scores effectively against the other, and whether those past games reflect the current rosters and coaching strategies.
Late injury or lineup announcements typically move spread prices quickly for this market; the direction and magnitude of movement depend on which player is affected and how central they are to each team’s strategy, with larger moves more likely in low‑liquidity markets.
A total volume of $2,800 indicates modest liquidity relative to larger markets; that means prices may be more sensitive to individual trades and sudden information, and higher volume would generally produce more stable and reliable price signals.