| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascal Siakam: 2+ | 41% | 37¢ | 44¢ | — | $108 | Trade → |
| Pascal Siakam: 1+ | 76% | 71¢ | 79¢ | — | $46 | Trade → |
| Pascal Siakam: 3+ | 20% | 9¢ | 21¢ | — | $5 | Trade → |
| Pascal Siakam: 4+ | 0% | 2¢ | 8¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Pascal Siakam: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 6¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how many three-pointers will be made in the Indiana at Portland game; it matters because three-point production is a major driver of scoring variance and game outcomes.
Indiana and Portland carry different offensive identities and recent rosters have emphasized perimeter shooting leaguewide, so matchups and rotations matter more than a single game’s win-loss context. Historical head-to-head numbers can provide clues, but roster changes, injuries, and coaching strategies produce the biggest short-term swings.
Market prices reflect the betting community’s aggregated expectations about three-point production and update as new information arrives; interpret prices as a summary of available public information rather than a fixed prediction.
Whether overtime counts depends on this market’s official settlement rules; many sports markets include overtime unless the rules explicitly say 'regulation only,' so check the market rules on the exchange page for this specific event.
The listed close time is TBD for this market; exchanges commonly close markets at the official game start or earlier if a key lineup/injury update is released, so monitor the market page for the announced close time.
Watch players who typically take high volumes of three-point attempts and their projected minutes—starting guards and primary wing shooters—as well as any late changes to the rotation that shift three-point attempts to backups or bench units.
Use head-to-head totals as context for matchup tendencies, but prioritize recent form, current rosters, and defensive assignments; small sample sizes and roster turnover can make older matchups less predictive.
Settlement is based on the official game box score and the exchange’s stated data source; in-game ejections or injuries affect the box score and thus the market outcome, and any disputed scoring is handled according to the exchange’s dispute and settlement policies.