| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 66.5 1H points scored | 69% | 47¢ | 68¢ | — | $32 | Trade → |
| Over 72.5 1H points scored | 0% | 20¢ | 44¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 78.5 1H points scored | 0% | 0¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 81.5 1H points scored | 0% | 0¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 57.5 1H points scored | 0% | 47¢ | 100¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 60.5 1H points scored | 0% | 69¢ | 89¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 63.5 1H points scored | 0% | 57¢ | 82¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 75.5 1H points scored | 0% | 13¢ | 34¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 69.5 1H points scored | 0% | 33¢ | 55¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks traders to predict the combined points scored by Idaho and Montana in the first half of their game. First-half totals matter because they isolate early-game tempo and strategy, which differ from full-game dynamics.
Idaho and Montana are programs with distinct offensive and defensive profiles that influence how quickly points are generated early in games. Historical matchups, current-season form, the matchup's venue, and coaching styles all provide useful context when assessing first-half scoring. Because rosters and play-calling change season to season, recent games carry more weight than older history.
Market prices reflect the collective view of which scoring ranges are most likely for the first half; use them as a signal alongside film study, injury reports, and weather. Treat prices as one input among several rather than definitive predictions.
The platform sets the market close time; for first-half markets this is typically at or before kickoff, but check the market page for the exact close time as it may be listed as TBD until finalized.
This market offers nine discrete outcomes, each corresponding to a particular range or bucket for the combined Idaho–Montana first-half score.
Watch the projected starting quarterbacks (their tendency to push the pace or manage clock), the teams’ lead running backs and top receivers, key pass-rushers and secondary players who force turnovers, and the kicker/special teams for early scoring opportunities.
Recent first-half results between the teams can reveal tendencies, but give greater weight to recent seasons, roster changes, and coaching turnover—small sample sizes can be misleading.
Monitor late injury reports and starter confirmations, unfavorable or improving weather forecasts, last-minute lineup or scheme changes announced by coaches, and any travel-related disruptions; these can all alter expected pacing and scoring.