| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 145.5 points scored | 47% | 47¢ | 50¢ | — | $7K | Trade → |
| Over 142.5 points scored | 57% | 55¢ | 57¢ | — | $76 | Trade → |
| Over 160.5 points scored | 15% | 15¢ | 20¢ | — | $75 | Trade → |
| Over 139.5 points scored | 64% | 61¢ | 65¢ | — | $60 | Trade → |
| Over 151.5 points scored | 32% | 32¢ | 35¢ | — | $21 | Trade → |
| Over 133.5 points scored | 79% | 73¢ | 78¢ | — | $16 | Trade → |
| Over 136.5 points scored | 0% | 68¢ | 72¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 154.5 points scored | 0% | 25¢ | 29¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 130.5 points scored | 0% | 78¢ | 85¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 148.5 points scored | 0% | 40¢ | 42¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 157.5 points scored | 0% | 20¢ | 26¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how many combined points Idaho and Montana will score in their matchup by selecting one of several total-point outcomes; it matters for traders and fans who want a market-based read on expected scoring rather than a single point spread.
Idaho vs. Montana is a matchup between programs that have faced each other repeatedly and whose game scripts can vary from low-scoring defensive battles to higher-scoring affairs depending on personnel and coaching. Season-to-season changes in rosters, coaching philosophy, and game location (home/away) can produce substantial swings in expected totals, so historical context is useful but not determinative.
Each outcome represents a specific combined-score bucket for the game; market prices summarize what traders currently think is most likely given available information. Use the market as a continuously updated synthesis of public information — not a fixed forecast — and check the contract rules for settlement details.
Settlement timing is determined by the market contract and KALSHI rules; typically the market settles after the official final game score is posted by the relevant league or game official, and any contract-specific settlement window or time is applied.
The 11 outcomes correspond to discrete total-point buckets (ranges) for the combined score of Idaho and Montana; at settlement the outcome whose range contains the official combined score will be declared the winner.
Whether overtime counts is specified in the market’s contract language on the KALSHI page; some markets use regulation-only scores, others use the official final score including overtime — check the event details to confirm.
Traders typically react to injury and lineup news by updating positions, which can change market prices; when evaluating the market, consider how the absence or return of specific players affects tempo, red-zone efficiency, and scoring opportunities for both teams.
Head-to-head history provides context on tendencies and matchup dynamics (e.g., whether games have trended high- or low-scoring), but it should be combined with current-season form, roster changes, and situational factors since past results may not reflect the present-day teams.