| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 149.5 points scored | 52% | 52¢ | 54¢ | — | $2K | Trade → |
| Over 152.5 points scored | 44% | 44¢ | 47¢ | — | $2K | Trade → |
| Over 146.5 points scored | 56% | 57¢ | 63¢ | — | $652 | Trade → |
| Over 161.5 points scored | 23% | 23¢ | 29¢ | — | $54 | Trade → |
| Over 167.5 points scored | 15% | 13¢ | 20¢ | — | $45 | Trade → |
| Over 155.5 points scored | 36% | 36¢ | 39¢ | — | $45 | Trade → |
| Over 158.5 points scored | 29% | 29¢ | 34¢ | — | $33 | Trade → |
| Over 143.5 points scored | 61% | 64¢ | 69¢ | — | $14 | Trade → |
| Over 140.5 points scored | 74% | 70¢ | 76¢ | — | $6 | Trade → |
| Over 164.5 points scored | 0% | 18¢ | 24¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 137.5 points scored | 0% | 75¢ | 82¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which combined total-points range the final Idaho at Eastern Washington game will fall into; it matters to traders who want to express views about how high- or low-scoring the game will be.
Idaho and Eastern Washington are regional opponents whose matchups have produced a wide range of scores over the years; both program styles, coaching changes, and roster turnover can shift game-to-game scoring dynamics. Markets like this let participants trade on those scoring expectations without taking a position on the outright winner.
Market prices reflect the collective view of traders about which scoring ranges are most likely; interpret prices as a dynamic signal that will change as new information (injuries, starters, weather) becomes available.
Each outcome corresponds to a specific total-points bucket or exact combined-score value; the winning outcome is the one that contains the official final combined points total as recorded by the game’s official source. Check the event page for the exact range labels used.
Resolution takes place after the game’s official final score is posted. If the game is postponed, canceled, or declared a no-contest, the platform’s event-resolution rules apply; consult the market rules or event notices for how such scenarios are handled.
Quarterbacks and offensive starters drive play-calling, pace, and scoring efficiency: a healthy, high-volume passing attack tends to push totals up, while backup QBs or weakened offensive lines often produce more conservative game plans and lower scoring. Monitor official starter reports and injury updates.
Recent head-to-head games and current-season scoring averages provide a baseline for expectations, but they should be adjusted for roster changes, coaching shifts, and strength of recent opponents. Give greater weight to the most recent and directly comparable games.
Venue factors like wind, cold, field surface, crowd noise, and travel fatigue can affect passing and kicking accuracy and overall tempo. These effects can depress scoring in adverse conditions or favor one team’s style—include them alongside injury and tactical information when assessing totals.