| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden State wins by over 5.5 Points | 57% | 56¢ | 57¢ | — | $39K | Trade → |
| Golden State wins by over 8.5 Points | 45% | 45¢ | 46¢ | — | $12K | Trade → |
| Golden State wins by over 2.5 Points | 68% | 64¢ | 68¢ | — | $6K | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 4.5 Points | 19% | 17¢ | 19¢ | — | $1K | Trade → |
| Golden State wins by over 14.5 Points | 29% | 25¢ | 29¢ | — | $737 | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 22.5 Points | 4% | 1¢ | 3¢ | — | $559 | Trade → |
| Golden State wins by over 20.5 Points | 13% | 12¢ | 16¢ | — | $556 | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 19.5 Points | 3% | 1¢ | 13¢ | — | $505 | Trade → |
| Golden State wins by over 11.5 Points | 35% | 34¢ | 38¢ | — | $395 | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 13.5 Points | 6% | 3¢ | 8¢ | — | $332 | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 16.5 Points | 6% | 3¢ | 7¢ | — | $300 | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 1.5 Points | 27% | 25¢ | 28¢ | — | $279 | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 7.5 Points | 13% | 11¢ | 15¢ | — | $114 | Trade → |
| Golden State wins by over 17.5 Points | 17% | 19¢ | 20¢ | — | $112 | Trade → |
| Utah wins by over 10.5 Points | 11% | 7¢ | 10¢ | — | $101 | Trade → |
This market asks which spread bracket the final Golden State at Utah margin will fall into; it matters because spread markets let traders express views about relative team strength and game dynamics beyond a simple win/loss outcome. Total traded volume so far is $10,167, reflecting current market interest.
Golden State (Warriors) vs Utah (Jazz) is a recurring NBA matchup with contrasting styles: Golden State typically emphasizes perimeter shooting and pace, while Utah has often prioritized half-court defense and interior play. Rosters, injuries, and coaching adjustments have produced both blowouts and close games in past seasons, so spread markets for this matchup can move on last-minute news and matchup-specific analytics.
Market odds on spread outcomes summarize collective expectations about the final point differential; read them as the market’s current consensus about which margin-range is most likely, but treat them as a dynamic input that updates with new information.
The market resolves based on the official final score: calculate the point differential (Golden State points minus Utah points) and find which labeled spread interval contains that differential; the outcome covering that interval is the winner.
The listed close time is TBD; typically trading closes at or before game tip-off and the market resolves after the game reaches an official final result. If the game is postponed or not completed, resolution follows the platform’s stated cancellation or voiding policies.
They are consecutive point-differential brackets ranging from one team winning by a large margin through to the other team winning by a large margin, including intermediate ranges that capture close games and potential exact-margin brackets defined by the market.
Late injury reports and confirmed starting lineups, announced minute restrictions for key players, coach comments about rotations, and any travel or illness reports should be monitored because they can materially shift expected margins for this matchup.
Use head-to-head history to identify recurring matchup advantages (e.g., defensive schemes that limit a particular team’s strength), but weigh those trends alongside current-season roster changes, recent form, and context like home/away splits rather than relying solely on older results.