| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODDIK | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Legacy | 0% | 0¢ | 0¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which team will win Map 1 of the FERJEE In House 2026 match between ODDIK and Legacy. The result matters for short-term bettors and bettors tracking map-by-map performance and momentum in the series.
FERJEE In House 2026 appears to be a community-run in-house event rather than an official league match; in-house events often feature experimental lineups, casual stakes, and variable officiating. ODDIK and Legacy are the two competing teams for this map, and their recent practice form, roster stability, and map preferences provide useful context when assessing expected outcomes.
Prediction market odds show collective sentiment based on available information and move as new details (lineups, veto order, delays) arrive; treat them as a real-time indicator of market expectations rather than a guaranteed forecast.
Close time is listed as TBD; typically the market will close at or shortly before the official start of Map 1 and will resolve once the event organizer posts an official result to KALSHI. Check the KALSHI event page for the final close and resolution times.
This market tracks the winner of Map 1 only. The two outcomes are ODDIK wins Map 1 or Legacy wins Map 1; it does not cover the overall series or other maps.
Announced roster changes or stand-ins should be treated as important new information: they can materially change team coordination and role assignments and often cause market updates once public. In-house events commonly feature substitutions that increase outcome variance.
Resolution will follow KALSHI's and the event organizer's official guidance. If the map is not played or is voided by organizers, the market may be voided or resolved according to those official rules; consult KALSHI's published resolution notes for this event.
Head-to-head and map-specific records provide helpful context, but weigh them by recency, map veto differences, and the in-house setting. Small sample sizes and the informal nature of in-house matches can reduce the predictive power of historical stats.