| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 maps | 0% | 43¢ | 51¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how many maps will be played in the ESL Pro League 2026 match between Astralis and Legacy; it matters because total maps reflects match competitiveness and influences bettors or traders tracking match length risk.
ESL Pro League is a top-tier international Counter-Strike competition that typically features league and playoff stages with bo1/bo3 formats depending on schedule; match format and stage determine the likely number of maps. Astralis is a historically prominent organization with deep tournament experience, while Legacy's form and roster stability in 2026 will shape expectations — recent results, roster moves, and map pool depth all provide context for this specific pairing.
Market odds represent the aggregated market view of how many maps this particular match will produce, based on available information and trader sentiment; interpret them as a summary of current expectations, not as fixed truth, and monitor changes as lineup, veto, or scheduling information updates.
The market will close according to the exchange’s published schedule for this listing — typically before the match starts or when the map veto/lineup is locked; if the listing shows ‘Closes: TBD’, check the market page for updates as ESL posts the official match time and veto window.
Total Maps equals the number of distinct maps played in the match; overtime rounds on a given map do not count as additional maps since overtime extends the same map rather than adding another map to the tally.
Settlement will follow the official ESL match report and tournament administration results as published by ESL Pro League and the exchange’s designated official feed; those authoritative sources determine the final map count.
Roster substitutions do not change how the market is settled — the market outcome is based on the maps actually played — but such substitutions can materially influence pre-match expectations and therefore may move market pricing before close.
Head-to-head history can indicate matchup tendencies (e.g., one team consistently forcing deciders on certain maps), but sample sizes and roster continuity matter; use historical results alongside current rosters, recent form, and map pool overlap rather than relying solely on past meetings.