| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 144.5 points scored | 51% | 49¢ | 51¢ | — | $3K | Trade → |
| Over 138.5 points scored | 0% | 63¢ | 66¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 159.5 points scored | 0% | 15¢ | 22¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 141.5 points scored | 0% | 56¢ | 60¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 132.5 points scored | 0% | 74¢ | 80¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 150.5 points scored | 0% | 33¢ | 39¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 129.5 points scored | 0% | 78¢ | 85¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 135.5 points scored | 0% | 69¢ | 74¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 153.5 points scored | 0% | 27¢ | 31¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 147.5 points scored | 0% | 41¢ | 46¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Over 156.5 points scored | 0% | 20¢ | 26¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which total-points range the Eastern Michigan at Buffalo game will finish in. Totals markets matter because they let traders express views about game tempo, defenses, and scoring without picking a winner.
Eastern Michigan and Buffalo are collegiate programs whose matchup outcomes depend on matchup-specific factors (roster health, pace, coaching) rather than long-term market forces. The market shows active interest (Total Volume Traded: $2,525) and offers 11 distinct outcomes to capture a range of possible final scores; the market close time is listed as TBD on the platform and will be posted by the organizer.
Prediction market prices here indicate the market's consensus about which total-points bucket is most likely; higher-priced outcomes reflect stronger trader conviction and/or demand for that bucket. Interpret prices as signals of collective expectations, but check liquidity and time to close before acting.
The market will close at the time the organizer sets (often at the official game start or a specified prior time). Because it currently shows TBD, monitor the market page for the announced close time and any platform updates.
The total typically equals the combined official points scored by both teams as recorded in the game's final box score. Whether overtime is included depends on this market's specific resolution rules — check the market's rule section on the trading platform for confirmation.
Head-to-head history can provide context about matchup tendencies, but place more weight on recent form, current rosters, and coaching changes because personnel and styles can shift season to season.
Key offensive contributors (starting QB or primary scorers), any announced absences, late rotations, and strategic choices about tempo (e.g., run-heavy vs. spread offense or slow-control vs. uptempo basketball) are the most influential.
More outcome buckets allow finer-grained expression of expectations but typically spread liquidity across options. Small trades can move individual buckets more easily than in a two-way market, so watch order depth and recent trading volume when assessing signal reliability.