| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAB wins by over 13.5 Points | 11% | 34¢ | 43¢ | — | $538 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 10.5 Points | 49% | 49¢ | 50¢ | — | $408 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 22.5 Points | 1% | 0¢ | 1¢ | — | $250 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 19.5 Points | 1% | 0¢ | 1¢ | — | $250 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 25.5 Points | 1% | 0¢ | 1¢ | — | $250 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 13.5 Points | 2% | 1¢ | 2¢ | — | $150 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 20.5 Points | 22% | 14¢ | 22¢ | — | $149 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 16.5 Points | 3% | 1¢ | 2¢ | — | $50 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 5.5 Points | 69% | 63¢ | 68¢ | — | $31 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 7.5 Points | 57% | 60¢ | 64¢ | — | $19 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 8.5 Points | 59% | 56¢ | 59¢ | — | $15 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 4.5 Points | 65% | 66¢ | 76¢ | — | $14 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 2.5 Points | 71% | 72¢ | 78¢ | — | $6 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 25.5 Points | 4% | 4¢ | 44¢ | — | $6 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 26.5 Points | 3% | 3¢ | 42¢ | — | $3 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 1.5 Points | 73% | 76¢ | 81¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 19.5 Points | 0% | 9¢ | 31¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 16.5 Points | 0% | 17¢ | 39¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 44¢ | 48¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 2.5 Points | 0% | 5¢ | 25¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 23.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 21¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 5.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 39¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 17.5 Points | 0% | 14¢ | 37¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 14.5 Points | 0% | 24¢ | 43¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 7.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 34¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 1.5 Points | 0% | 14¢ | 28¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 25¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| East Carolina wins by over 4.5 Points | 0% | 3¢ | 42¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| UAB wins by over 22.5 Points | 0% | 4¢ | 25¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how the point spread will play out in the college football game between East Carolina and UAB; it matters because spread outcomes capture expectations about the margin of victory and shift as new information arrives.
East Carolina and UAB are FBS programs with different styles of play and season trajectories; matchup dynamics are shaped by recent form, roster availability, and where the game is played. Historical head-to-head patterns and each program's typical offensive and defensive strengths provide context, but the relevant information for this market is the current season's personnel, injuries, and recent results.
Prediction market prices on a spread market represent the collective view of where the game margin is likely to fall relative to listed spread outcomes; price movements reflect new information or changes in participant expectations rather than a fixed prediction.
The close time is set by the platform and listed on the event page; because this event currently shows 'TBD' for closing, monitor the market page for a firm cutoff, which is typically before kickoff.
Each outcome corresponds to a specific spread threshold or margin range offered by the market; the market will settle to whichever listed outcome matches the game’s final margin according to the platform’s settlement rules.
Home-field factors such as crowd noise, travel fatigue for the visitor, and familiarity with the venue can shift expectations; markets often price a home-field edge, and bettors will adjust positions if local conditions or announcements amplify or reduce that edge.
Major drivers include last-minute injury news (especially to quarterbacks), unexpected weather forecasts, confirmed lineup changes, large bets concentrated on one side, and official announcements that materially change either team’s expected scoring ability.
Settlement procedures for exact margins depend on the platform’s rules; some markets avoid pushes by using half-points while others have explicit tie-resolution rules — check KALSHI’s event-specific settlement terms to see how this East Carolina at UAB market will be resolved.