| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas wins by over 19.5 Points | 11% | 7¢ | 13¢ | — | $100 | Trade → |
| Memphis wins by over 8.5 Points | 0% | 12¢ | 22¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Memphis wins by over 2.5 Points | 0% | 27¢ | 38¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Memphis wins by over 11.5 Points | 0% | 11¢ | 16¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dallas wins by over 7.5 Points | 0% | 31¢ | 42¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dallas wins by over 16.5 Points | 0% | 11¢ | 18¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Memphis wins by over 5.5 Points | 0% | 18¢ | 29¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dallas wins by over 1.5 Points | 0% | 56¢ | 59¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dallas wins by over 4.5 Points | 0% | 45¢ | 48¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dallas wins by over 13.5 Points | 0% | 14¢ | 24¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Dallas wins by over 10.5 Points | 0% | 21¢ | 32¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks how the point spread will resolve for the Dallas at Memphis game; it matters because the spread captures consensus expectations about margin of victory and is used by traders to express views on relative team strength and game flow.
Dallas and Memphis are NBA franchises with contrasting styles: Dallas often leans on isolation scoring and star-driven offense, while Memphis emphasizes pace, transition scoring, and defense. Historical matchups, recent form, roster availability, and home-court dynamics all shape expectations for the spread between these two teams.
Odds in this market reflect collective market expectations about which side of specific spread thresholds the final score will fall on; higher market prices indicate outcomes the crowd sees as less likely, and lower prices indicate outcomes the crowd sees as more likely.
The event page lists the close as TBD; markets of this type typically close shortly before game start or when official rosters/lineups are locked, so monitor the platform for the exact closing time.
Each outcome corresponds to a range or specific point-spread result (e.g., Dallas covering by X points or Memphis covering by Y); a successful outcome is determined by the official final score relative to the spread definitions shown on the market.
Late injuries can materially shift expected margins by removing key scorers or defenders; markets often react quickly to credible injury news, and the absence or limited minutes of a star alters which spread outcomes become more likely.
Head-to-head trends can highlight matchup advantages or stylistic mismatches, but they should be weighted alongside current-season form, roster changes, and situational context (rest, travel, injuries) rather than used in isolation.
Key metrics include each team’s recent margin of victory, offensive and defensive efficiency, turnover rates, rebound rates, three-point shooting consistency, and minutes played by primary scorers and key bench players.