| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 3+ | 59% | 52¢ | 59¢ | — | $53 | Trade → |
| Jalen Johnson: 2+ | 45% | 40¢ | 42¢ | — | $11 | Trade → |
| Cooper Flagg: 2+ | 34% | 25¢ | 34¢ | — | $5 | Trade → |
| CJ McCollum: 2+ | 75% | 58¢ | 74¢ | — | $3 | Trade → |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 2+ | 83% | 69¢ | 83¢ | — | $1 | Trade → |
| Cooper Flagg: 3+ | 0% | 8¢ | 14¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| CJ McCollum: 5+ | 0% | 3¢ | 15¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 1+ | 0% | 72¢ | 99¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| CJ McCollum: 4+ | 0% | 15¢ | 28¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jalen Johnson: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 9¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| CJ McCollum: 3+ | 0% | 41¢ | 50¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Cooper Flagg: 4+ | 0% | 0¢ | 7¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jalen Johnson: 3+ | 0% | 12¢ | 20¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| CJ McCollum: 1+ | 0% | 71¢ | 96¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jalen Johnson: 1+ | 0% | 62¢ | 77¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 4+ | 0% | 25¢ | 38¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Cooper Flagg: 1+ | 0% | 64¢ | 67¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 5+ | 0% | 8¢ | 21¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Cooper Flagg: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 6¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Jalen Johnson: 5+ | 0% | 0¢ | 8¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market lets traders take positions on the distribution of three-pointers made in the Dallas at Atlanta game rather than the game's winner. It matters because three-point volume is driven by team strategy and player availability and can move quickly as lineups and game conditions change.
Dallas and Atlanta both feature perimeter-oriented offenses, so three-point attempts are a key axis of competition; team pace, starter vs. bench minutes, and matchup-specific defensive plans historically drive variation in total threes. This particular market has 20 discrete outcomes and modest trading activity so far (reported total volume $27); the market close time is listed as TBD on the platform.
Market prices/odds reflect the collective expectation for how many three-pointers will be made and will adjust as new information (injuries, starting lineups, weather for travel, late scratches) becomes available. Traders interpret movements as shifts in that expectation, not as guarantees of the final result.
The market's close time is listed as TBD; on many platforms markets for game-specific prop outcomes close at or shortly before official game start, but check the market page for the platform's official closing and any late updates.
The most influential players are the teams' primary ball-handlers and designated perimeter shooters who create and take the bulk of three-point attempts. Check the announced starters and projected minutes on game day to see which specific names will matter.
Those factors can materially reduce or increase three-point totals: foul trouble can shorten a starter's minutes, a blowout can lead to expanded bench minutes (often changing shot profiles), and coaching adjustments to pace or defensive focus will alter shot volume and quality.
Historical head-to-head figures provide useful context for tendencies, but they should be adjusted for current season roster changes, injuries, coaching strategies, and pace metrics; use history as one input among matchup-specific, recent-trend, and roster-availability information.
A 20-outcome structure breaks the possible three-point totals into many discrete buckets, allowing fine-grained positions on exact counts or narrow ranges; however, low liquidity (current reported volume $27) can mean wider spreads and greater slippage when trading.