| Outcome | Probability | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | 24h Change | Volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ex-Zero Tenacity | 0% | 25¢ | 38¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
| Leo Team | 0% | 62¢ | 75¢ | — | $0 | Trade → |
This market asks which team wins Map 2 of the CCT Europe Series #17 2026 match between ex-Zero Tenacity and Leo Team. Map-specific markets matter because they let traders express views on map pools, veto strategies, and matchup strengths rather than the overall match result.
CCT Europe Series events are part of a regional competitive circuit where individual maps and map picks can swing series outcomes; teams often prepare map-by-map strategies and may prioritize certain maps based on their tactical identity. Map pools, recent patch changes to the game, and any roster or role changes entering the event all provide relevant context for how a single map is likely to play out.
Market prices reflect the collective information and sentiment about who will win Map 2; they update as new public information appears (lineup confirmations, map vetoes, match delays, or official admin reports). Use them as a snapshot of market expectations, but check live match feeds and official match reports for last-minute changes that can alter resolution.
The market resolves to the team officially recorded as the winner of Map 2 in the match report from the event organizers; official overtime results count, and the platform will follow its posted resolution rules if the map is not played or the match is cancelled.
The close time is listed as TBD on the event page; settlement occurs after the match concludes and the official Map 2 result is published by tournament administrators, so monitor the event schedule and official feeds for exact timing.
Important triggers include announced lineup changes or stand‑ins for either ex-Zero Tenacity or Leo Team, an unexpected change in the agreed map order, known player illness or connectivity issues before the map, and official admin decisions or delays tied to the match.
Map 2 is defined by the veto/pick sequence used in this best-of format; whether it is a team pick, opponent pick, or a decider after Map 1 alters strategic incentives—so the veto outcome and which side each team starts on are directly relevant to assessing Map 2.
Focus on recent performances on the same map, the sample size of those matches, and whether the lineups were consistent with the current rosters; weigh recency and context (patches, role changes, regional metas) more heavily than distant results.